Michael Baker - Thesis - Problems in Longterm Forecasting and Planning

About | Contents
Previous: A4. A Half Hourly Electricity System Model | This: A5. Correspondence with the Central Statistical Office | Next: References


A5. Correspondence with the Central Statistical Office

This Appendix consists of two letters from CSO and a reply from me. The letter from Fred Johnson and my reply were both accompanied by tables of estimates of the output of, and inputs to, road haulage. These were my first and second sets of estimates. For comparison I have also included the final set of estimates which appeared in Baker (1979a).

royal crest

C A B I N E T   O F F I C E

Central Statistical Office

Great George Street, London SWIP 3AQ Telephone 01-233 7693

 

Our ref: D2/22

22 March 1979

 
 

Dear Mike

ROAD HAULAGE 1974

There has been some discussion between the CSO and the Department of the Environment about the appropriate weight to be given to the road haulage industry (excluding own account) in the index of GDP(0). The weight is based on the gross value added in the industry in 1975 and the main problem is over the size of the profits component of value added.

The national accounts derive their estimates of value added from inland revenue returns and these show considerably lower profits than those implied from other sources - including the estimates of input and output of road haulage which you prepared for the 1974 input/output tables. Table 5 of your first report (copy attached) shows total output of £2436m and total inputs (including labour costs) of £1693m thus giving a residual profit figure of £743m. This is about twice as large as the revenue estimate.

What I would like to ask is whether you have any views on the reliability of your estimates. I realise that they are based largely on the Commercial Motor tables of operating costs and to that extent simply mirror the soundness of those tables. But do you know of any other sources which might provide an alternative estimate of profitability in road haulage?

I am sorry to drag you into what is essentially an internal problem but now that you are a world expert on UK transport statistics could we ask for some free advice? I am copying this to Keith Childs in the GDP(0) section here and Mike Haslam at DoE.

Yours sincerely
[Signed Fred Johnson]
F J JOHNSON

Mr M Baker
Energy Research Group
Open University
Walton Hall
Milton Keynes
Bedfordshire

Enc

 

Table A5.1 shows my 1st round estimates on road haulage and was enclosed with Fred Johnson's letter of 11 March 1979 (see above).

Table A5.1 Road Haulage 1974 (1st estimates)
Output£ million
I.O. No.(s)      Commodity Total
94(703) Road Haulage 2 435.7
Physical Output
I.O. No.(s)      Commodity Total
94(703) Road Haulage (million tonnes)
             (million tonne km)
  731.4
   49.210
Input£ million
I.O. No.(s)      Commodity Total
5,6,7,11,59
85,95,102
11

59
 ?
89
99

100,0
102
 
Overheads

Fuel
Lubricants
Spare parts
Other materials for vehicles
Tyres
Vehicle insurance
Other Insurance
Rent and rates
Amounts paid out  for
maintenance and repairs
  114.4

  261.0
   11.6
   88.9
   13.0
   76.5
   94.0
   20.5
   39.9

   66.2
0

0
Salaries, wages, N.I. and
grad. pension
Licences

  848.7
   58.5
  Total 1 693.2
Physical Input
I.O. No.(s)      Commodity Total
11 Fuel ('000 gallons)   561.100

OU logo


 

THE OPEN UNIVERSITY

 

Energy Research Group
The Open University
Walton Hall
Milton Keynes MK7 6AA
England

Telephone:

Milton Keynes 74066

Direct Line:

Milton Keynes 6 3338

Our Ref:
Your Ref:

MB/PC

 


F. J. Johnson
Central Statistical Office
Great George Street
London SW19 3AQ

 
 

27 March 1979

 

Dear Fred,

Thank you for your letter of 22 March and for conferring
World Status, frankly I feel woefully ill informed.
I am enclosing my (hopefully) final results for Road
Haulage.  These are based on the work I cam to discuss
with you about a month ago.

I am assuming that all public haulage in Order XXII
is performed by Road Haulage, MLH 703.  It is probably
not but I suspect the difference is within the level
of accuracy of the estimates.  You will see that the
Gross Profit is now £449m (considerably less than
the previous £743m).

I have made certain changes to my methods which you
will be able to see when I have finished writing up the
road trasport work.  Basically, I hgave reduced the
Rent and Rates and Interest unit costs to 0.2 of the
Commercial Motor Table values and Insurance to 0.6 of
the CM values.  This is to keep the figures more in
line with the results quoted in Edward + Bayliss,
Operating Costs in Road Freight Transport.  I have also
altered the method of calculating Overheads and Profit
which CM take as 20% of all other costs, for both.  I
am now taking 7.87% and 0% respectively for own account
operation and 18.08% and 23.16% for public haulage which
are again in line with Edward + Bayliss.  If the revenue
estimate is similar to my own this would be a great
comfort as the Edward and Baylis figures are for 1965!

I hope this may be of some help.

Yours sincerely,

Mike Baker

Mike Baker

Encs:

 

Table A5.2 shows my 2nd round estimates on road haulage and was enclosed with my letter of 27 March 1979 (see above).

Table A5.2 Road Haulage 1974 (2nd estimates)
Output£ million
I.O. No.(s)      Commodity Total
94(703) Road Haulage 2 435.7 1614.8
Physical Output
I.O. No.(s)      Commodity Total
94(703) Road Haulage (million tonnes)
             (million tonne km)
  731.4
   49.210
Input£ million
I.O. No.(s)      Commodity Total
5,6,7,11,59
85,95,102
11

59
 ?
89
99

100,0
102
 
Overheads

Fuel
Lubricants
Spare parts
Other materials for vehicles
Tyres
Vehicle insurance
Other Insurance
Rent and rates Hiring Vehicles
Amounts paid out  for
maintenance and repairs
  114.4  73.5

  261.0 277.0
   11.6
   88.9  96.5
   13.0   5.6
   76.5  74.0
   94.0  60.7
   20.5
   39.9  25.1

   66.2  28.9
0

0
 
Salaries, wages, N.I. and
grad. pension
Licences Taxes
Gross profit

  848.7 470.0
   58.5  55.0
        448.6
  Total 1 693.2 1614.8
Value added is 60.3%
Physical Input
I.O. No.(s)      Commodity Total
11 Fuel ('000 gallons)   561.100

Table A5.3 shows my final estimates on road haulage which appeared in Baker (1979a).

Table A5.3 Road Haulage 1974 (final estimates)
Output£ million
I.O. No.(s)      Commodity Total
94(703) Road Haulage  1537.7
Physical Output
I.O. No.(s)      Commodity Total
94(703) Road Haulage (million tonnes)
             (million tonne km)
   673.3
 52246
Input£ million
I.O. No.(s)      Commodity Total
5,6,7,11,59
85,95,102
11

59
 ?
89

94(703)

99

102
 
Overheads

Fuel and Lubricants

Spare parts
Other materials for vehicles
Tyres

Hiring vehicles

Insurance

Amounts paid out for
maintenance and repairs
   70.0

  285.7

   94.7
    5.5
   74.0

   22.2

   54.7


   28.3
0

0
0
Salaries, wages, N.I. and
grad. pension
Taxes
Gross profit

  419.2
   48.7
  434.8
  Total  1537.7
Physical Input
I.O. No.(s)      Commodity Total
11 Fuel ('000 tonnes)  2280

royal crest

C A B I N E T   O F F I C E

Central Statistical Office

Great George Street, London SWIP 3AQ Telephone 01-233 7350

 

Our Ref: D2/22/H01514

 

2 May 1979

 

Dear Mr Baker

TRANSPORT SECTOR INPUT-OUTPUT 1974

I have just seen, in manuscript, your final input-output reports for the transport industries for 1974.

Various parts of your report, in its earlier stages, have already been incorporated in our tables on a provisional basis. I have no doubt that in a work of this size there will be a number of points needing clarification and further discussion, and we may of course need to modify your results in some respects when we have completed our look at the input-output results as a whole. It is perhaps too early yet to make a final assessment of the value of your work.

But on the basis of what has been looked into so far, it is clear that it does represent a major improvement in the methods of arriving at reliable estimates of the transactions of the transport industries and in the quality of the results obtained.

I must congratulate you on the thoroughness and care that have obviously been taken to arrive at these very comprehensive results. I am sure your report and methods used will be a model for preparing similar estimates for the transport sector for future years.

I am sending copies of this letter to Dr G Alexander, Head of the Energy Research Group and to Mr T R Walsh of the Transport and Road Research Laboratory.

 
 

T M Baker Esq
Energy Research Group
The Open University
Milton Keynes
MK7 6AA

Yours sincerely
[Signed M J G Lockyer]
M J G LOCKYER
Chief Statistician

 

About | Contents
Previous: A4. A Half Hourly Electricity System Model | This: A5. Correspondence with the Central Statistical Office | Next: References
Copyright © Michael Baker 1981,2005. All Rights Reserved.